Data as of .
SCLZ vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year YMAG paid 35.5% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.4%, though SCLZ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SCLZ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SCLZ | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income S 15.87% |
| APPLE INC 6.15% | Yieldmax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.60% |
| NVIDIA CORP 5.99% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.37% |
| ALPHABET INC 5.18% | Yieldmax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.08% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 14.02% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.71% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 13.98% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | Yieldmax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.08% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | YMAG | SCLZ | YMAG | SCLZ | YMAG | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +6.1% | 2.1% | 9.4% | −3.6 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | +15.4% | 3.8% | 21.1% | +1.6 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | +13.2% | +9.7% | 8.4% | 35.5% | −14.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +36.5% | +70.7% | 19.6% | 89.1% | −6.3 pts | −34.1 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | YieldMax |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 934 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $297m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SCLZ or YMAG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting price in cash and YMAG paid 35.5%, so YMAG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SCLZ or YMAG?
- With every distribution reinvested, SCLZ returned +13.2% and YMAG returned +9.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SCLZ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or YMAG?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.