Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

DYLG vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QUSA paid 14.6% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.2%, though DYLG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYLG and QUSA

Net assets: $4.8m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $20m on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

At a glance
9.2%
DYLG cash paid, 1 year
14.6%
QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+14.8%
DYLG total return, 1 year
+1.9%
QUSA total return, 1 year
DYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
DYLG
+14.8%
none

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% cash

9.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QUSA · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 12.9 pts behind SPY
QUSA
+1.9%
SPY
+14.8%

12.9 pts behind SPY

QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

QUSA

+1.9%

14.6% cash

12.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

12.9 pts behind SPY

QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

QUSA

+1.9%

12.9 pts behind SPY

14.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DYLG costs 0.62 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.9 points; QUSA is 4.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DYLG vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDYLGQUSA
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+1.9%
Price change, 1 yearrose 4.7%fell 12.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate32% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.97%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$4.8m$22m
Holdings
Holdings in common21%

Method

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and QUSA hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYLG QUSA
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.29% 6.27%
VISA INC. 4.17% 5.70%
ALPHABET INC. 4.05% 4.97%
APPLE INC. 3.52% 7.27%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 2.29% 6.15%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.32% 2.96%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYLG
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 11.60%
CATERPILLAR INC. 9.28%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 4.72%
AMGEN INC. 4.39%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 4.26%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.01%
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 3.88%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY 3.83%
Only in QUSA
Lam Research Corp 4.91%
Mastercard Inc 4.37%
Adobe Inc 4.17%
Applied Materials Inc 4.17%
GE Vernova Inc 3.81%
Netflix Inc 3.80%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.71%
Broadcom Inc 3.32%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call, paying monthly QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 4.0% 15.4%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year 9.2% 14.6%
Price change, 1 year +4.7% −12.3%
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +1.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%
Ahead or behind not available −12.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 32% 100%
Age 3.3 years 1.5 years
Net assets, DYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and QUSA as of Nov 3, 2026 $4.8m $20m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DYLG vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDYLGQUSADYLGQUSADYLGQUSA
3 months−0.1%−8.5%0.8%3.6%not measured−8.4 pts
6 months+8.2%−5.5%1.8%7.3%not measured−10.5 pts
1 year+14.8%+1.9%9.2%14.6%not measured−12.8 pts
3 years+53.4%–31.6%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: DYLG Jul 2023 · QUSA May 2025+49.0%−1.8%31.3%17.3%not measured−41.3 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QUSA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 32% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QUSA

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QUSA paid 14.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.4%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DYLG or QUSA?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 14.6%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and QUSA +1.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DYLG or QUSA?
DYLG charges 0.35% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYLG against QUSA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-qusa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.