Data as of .
QUSA vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and QYLG hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QUSA | QYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 5.99% | 7.73% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.78% | 8.44% |
| Microsoft Corp | 6.08% | 5.77% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 4.28% | 3.11% |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.70% | 2.67% |
| Walmart Inc | 4.17% | 2.25% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.22% | 3.23% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.84% | 3.00% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 4.40% | 1.73% |
| Lam Research Corp | 3.47% | 1.57% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 2.61% | 1.53% |
| Netflix Inc | 3.79% | 1.30% |
| Only in QUSA | Only in QYLG |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99% |
| Caterpillar Inc 4.91% | AMAZON.COM INC 4.31% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 4.24% | TESLA INC 3.01% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.85% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85% |
| Visa Inc 3.37% | INTEL CORP 2.48% |
| Blackrock Inc 2.99% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.88% |
| Johnson & Johnson 2.93% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 1.77% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUSA | QYLG | QUSA | QYLG | QUSA | QYLG | |
| 3 months | −1.9% | −0.1% | 3.6% | 2.1% | −3.6 pts | +2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +10.4% | +19.6% | 7.8% | 4.6% | −4.3 pts | −4.7 pts |
| 1 year | +3.5% | +22.2% | 13.8% | 17.4% | −11.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +76.2% | not published | 51.1% | not published | −22.0 pts |
| Since launch | +4.9% | +122.0% | 15.1% | 75.3% | −25.8 pts | −52.0 pts |
| QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.3% | 6.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.97% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.8% | 17.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −11.0% | +2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.5% | +22.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.2% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 96% |
| Age | 500 days | 2187 days |
| Net assets | $22m | $175m |
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QUSA or QYLG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 17.4%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QUSA or QYLG?
- With every distribution reinvested, QUSA returned +3.5% and QYLG returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QUSA or QYLG?
- QUSA charges 0.97% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.