Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DDDD vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
DDDD and MAGY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DDDD and MAGY
Net assets: $7.8m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.
3.3 pts behind SCHD
DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SCHD
+20.4%
DDDD
+17.1%
3.4% as cash
3.3 pts behind SCHD
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.3 pts behind SCHD
DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SCHD
+20.4%
DDDD
+17.1%
3.3 pts behind SCHD
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MAGY costs 0.02 points a year less; MAGY is 11.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DDDD | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −1.5% |
| Price change | rose 13.4% (since Mar 12, 2026) | fell 26.1% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 76% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks, measured through SCHD | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $7.8m | $92m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DDDD | MAGY | DDDD | MAGY | DDDD | MAGY |
| 3 months | +7.5% | +4.0% | 1.6% | 5.4% | −1.0 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +0.8% | 3.3% | 11.3% | −2.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DDDD Mar 2026 · MAGY Apr 2025 | +17.1% | +25.7% | 3.4% | 44.0% | −3.3 pts | −37.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
DDDD
Over the period from its first trade on Mar 12, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, DDDD paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 13.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. US dividend stocks (SCHD) returned +20.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.3%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 76% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DDDD against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-magy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DDDD against MAGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-magy
[DDDD against MAGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-magy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.