Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CVRD vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against CVRD’s 7.7%, though CVRD returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CVRD and MAGY
Net assets: $32m on Jun 30, 2026 for Madison Covered Call ETF, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.
10.4 pts behind its own stocks
CVRD over 1 year: paid 7.7%, price +4.3%, total +12.7%, its own stocks +23.1%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own stocks
+23.1%
CVRD
+12.7%
7.7% of it arrived as cash
10.4 pts behind its own stocks
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.4 pts behind its own stocks
CVRD over 1 year: paid 7.7%, price +4.3%, total +12.7%, its own stocks +23.1%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own stocks
+23.1%
CVRD
+12.7%
10.4 pts behind its own stocks
7.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CVRD over 1 year: paid 7.7%, price +4.3%, total +12.7%, its own stocks +23.1%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CVRD costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.2 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CVRD | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | −1.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 4.3% | fell 26.1% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | its own stocks | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, CVRD as of Jun 30, 2026 and MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 | $32m | $94m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CVRD and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CVRD | MAGY | CVRD | MAGY | CVRD | MAGY |
| 3 months | +5.7% | +4.0% | 1.6% | 5.4% | −0.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +5.8% | +0.8% | 3.2% | 11.3% | −3.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | +12.7% | −1.5% | 7.7% | 24.0% | −10.4 pts | −7.8 pts |
| 3 years | +26.9% | – | 27.7% | – | not measured | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: CVRD Aug 2023 · MAGY Apr 2025 | +27.2% | +25.7% | 27.8% | 44.0% | not measured | −37.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
CVRD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CVRD paid 7.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.7%. CVRD's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026) returned +23.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid quarterly.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CVRD against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-magy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CVRD against MAGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-magy
[CVRD against MAGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-magy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.