Data as of .
MAGY vs RNTY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against RNTY’s 11.9%, though RNTY returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RNTY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and RNTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in RNTY |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | Welltower Inc 6.72% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | Prologis Inc 6.58% |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 6.18% |
| Texas Pacific Land Corp 4.94% | |
| Simon Property Group Inc 4.92% | |
| Equinix Inc 4.91% | |
| Iron Mountain Inc 4.19% | |
| St Joe Co/The 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | RNTY | MAGY | RNTY | MAGY | RNTY | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | −2.3% | 6.1% | 3.0% | −3.9 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +2.5% | 12.9% | 6.2% | −12.7 pts | −15.6 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | +4.6% | 26.5% | 11.9% | −9.4 pts | −12.0 pts |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +7.9% | 42.0% | 15.8% | −37.5 pts | −39.2 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | RNTY YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 12.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 11.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | −7.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +4.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | −12.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 513 days | 519 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $6m |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
RNTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, MAGY or RNTY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and RNTY paid 11.9%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or RNTY?
- With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and RNTY returned +4.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RNTY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, MAGY or RNTY?
- MAGY charges 0.99% a year and RNTY charges 0.99%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against RNTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-rnty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.