Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CHPY vs XLKI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CHPY paid 48.9% of its price in cash against XLKI’s 18.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CHPY and XLKI
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.2bn for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF and $35m for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF.
29.5 pts ahead of SPY
CHPY over 1 year: paid 48.9%, price −6.0%, total +44.3%, SPY +14.8%, +29.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
CHPY
+44.3%
48.9% of it arrived as cash
29.5 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
29.5 pts ahead of SPY
CHPY over 1 year: paid 48.9%, price −6.0%, total +44.3%, SPY +14.8%, +29.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
CHPY
+44.3%
48.9% as cash
29.5 pts ahead of SPY
48.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CHPY over 1 year: paid 48.9%, price −6.0%, total +44.3%, SPY +14.8%, +29.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.9.5 pts behind XLK
XLKI over 1 year: paid 18.8%, price −8.1%, total +11.2%, XLK +20.7%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XLK
+20.7%
XLKI
+11.2%
18.8% as cash
9.5 pts behind XLK
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.5 pts behind XLK
XLKI over 1 year: paid 18.8%, price −8.1%, total +11.2%, XLK +20.7%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XLK
+20.7%
XLKI
+11.2%
9.5 pts behind XLK
18.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XLKI over 1 year: paid 18.8%, price −8.1%, total +11.2%, XLK +20.7%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
XLKI costs 0.68 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.1 points; CHPY is far larger, $1.2bn against $35m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CHPY | XLKI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +44.3% | +11.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 6.0% | fell 8.1% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 99% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | Technology sector, measured through XLK |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.2bn | $35m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Aug 8, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 64 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: CHPY against SPY, Apr 11, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026; XLKI against XLK, Aug 8, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Aug 2025 to Oct 2026, CHPY returned more: +77.0% to +22.7%. XLKI swung less: 16.9% to 31.5%. XLKI fell less at its worst: −8.9% to −24.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CHPY | XLKI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +77.0% | +22.7% | CHPY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +59.0% | +18.1% | CHPY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +6.1% | −1.4% | CHPY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 31.5% | 16.9% | XLKI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 19.7% | 11.7% | XLKI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.4% | −8.9% | XLKI | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 283.2% | 55.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 127.1% | 81.7% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.58 | 0.69 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.46 | 0.89 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.51 | 0.84 | CHPY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 2.42 | 1.21 | CHPY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.348 | 0.206 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 2.42 | 2.04 | CHPY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | SPY | XLK | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +22.9% a year | −2.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.28 | −0.41 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −12.8% to +58.6% | −12.7% to +8.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 1.51 | −1.04 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 22.9% | 9.2% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 64 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CHPY and XLKI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CHPY | XLKI | CHPY | XLKI | CHPY | XLKI |
| 3 months | −14.2% | −4.8% | 9.9% | 4.4% | −14.1 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | −9.7% | −0.6% | 20.6% | 9.9% | −14.7 pts | −4.6 pts |
| 1 year | +44.3% | +11.2% | 48.9% | 18.8% | +29.5 pts | −9.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CHPY Apr 2025 · XLKI Jul 2025 | +126.5% | +22.1% | 87.4% | 24.6% | +81.2 pts | −12.1 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CHPY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CHPY paid 48.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +44.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 29.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 40.7%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XLKI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XLKI paid 18.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +20.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid monthly. State Street estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CHPY against XLKI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-xlki
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CHPY against XLKI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-xlki
[CHPY against XLKI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-xlki)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.