CAIE vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year CAIE paid 14.0% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, and returned more with it reinvested. Calamos Autocallable Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

14.0%
CAIE cash paid, 1 year
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
+11.8%
CAIE total return, 1 year
+4.5%
JULH total return, 1 year
CAIE · 1 year to Sep 30, 20263.9 pts behind SPY
CAIE
+11.8%
SPY
+15.7%

3.9 pts behind SPY

CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

CAIE

+11.8%

14.0% of it arrived as cash

3.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.9 pts behind SPY

CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

CAIE

+11.8%

14.0% as cash

3.9 pts behind SPY

14.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

JULH · 1 year to Sep 30, 202611.2 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.5%
SPY
+15.7%

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

4.8% as cash

11.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

11.2 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · CAIE scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
4.0, the lowest in this set97.4, the highest

A percentile among the 175 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CAIE and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CAIE JULH
Only in CAIE
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00%
Only in JULH
TREASURY BILL 100.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowCAIEJULHCAIEJULHCAIEJULH
3 months+0.9%+2.0%2.3%1.6%−1.6 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+13.2%+3.6%6.3%2.7%−3.8 pts−13.4 pts
1 year+11.8%+4.5%14.0%4.8%−3.9 pts−11.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+21.9%not published18.6%not published−63.0 pts
Since launch
CAIE Jun 2025 · JULH Jul 2023
+26.1%+22.9%18.1%20.3%−1.2 pts−55.9 pts

CAIE and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CAIE
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer Calamos Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 14.1% 6.6%
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 14.0% 4.8%
Price change, 1 year −3.1% −0.4%
Total return, 1 year +11.8% +4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −3.9 pts −11.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 462 days 1185 days
Net assets $872m $17m

CAIE and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CAIE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CAIE paid 14.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.9 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid monthly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CAIE or JULH?
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CAIE paid 14.0% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so CAIE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CAIE or JULH?
With every distribution reinvested, CAIE returned +11.8% and JULH +4.5% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, CAIE or JULH?
CAIE charges 0.74% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so CAIE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CAIE against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caie-vs-julh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.