Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

BUCK vs LQDM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BUCK and LQDM both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BUCK and LQDM

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $517m for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF and $4.1m for Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF.

At a glance
6.7%
BUCK cash paid, 1 year
5.8%
LQDM cash paid, since launch, Apr 21, 2026
+3.3%
BUCK total return, 1 year
−1.4%
LQDM total return, since launch, Apr 21, 2026
BUCK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
BUCK
+3.3%
none

Not measured

BUCK over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price −3.4%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

BUCK

+3.3%

6.7% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

BUCK over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price −3.4%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

BUCK

+3.3%

6.7% as cash

6.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. BUCK over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price −3.4%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQDM · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LQDM
−1.4%
LQD
−2.0%

0.6 pts ahead of LQD

LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

LQD

−2.0%

LQDM

−1.4%

0.6 pts ahead of LQD

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.6 pts ahead of LQD

LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

LQD

−2.0%

LQDM

−1.4%

0.6 pts ahead of LQD

5.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

BUCK costs 0.16 points a year less; BUCK is far larger, $517m against $4.1m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BUCK vs LQDM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureBUCKLQDM
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+3.3%not published
Price changefell 3.4% (1 year)fell 7.2% (since Apr 21, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate50% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment65% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedUS investment grade bonds, measured through LQD
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.38%0.54%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$517m$4.1m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BUCK and LQDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BUCK LQDM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BUCK
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 99.75%
Only in LQDM
iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF 99.84%
LQD 11/06/2026 104.27 C -0.20%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF · Option income, paying monthly LQDM Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF · Option income on LQD, paying monthly
Strategy option income option income
Benchmark none US investment grade bonds (LQD)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.2% 12.1%
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.54%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.7% 5.8% (since launch, Apr 21, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −3.4% −7.2% (since launch, Apr 21, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +3.3% −1.4% (since launch, Apr 21, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published −2.0% (since launch, Apr 21, 2026)
Ahead or behind not available +0.6 pts (since launch, Apr 21, 2026)
Return of capital, latest estimate 50% 65%
Age 4.0 years 197 days
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $517m $4.1m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: BUCK vs LQDM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowBUCKLQDMBUCKLQDMBUCKLQDM
3 months+0.3%−0.5%1.5%2.9%not measured+0.4 pts
6 months+1.1%−1.4%3.1%5.8%not measured+0.6 pts
1 year+3.3%–6.7%–not measured–
3 years+15.2%–21.8%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: BUCK Oct 2022 · LQDM Apr 2026+20.5%−1.4%26.4%5.8%not measured+0.6 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LQDM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BUCK

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BUCK paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.3%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

LQDM

Over the period from its first trade on Apr 21, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, LQDM paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BUCK or LQDM?
BUCK charges 0.38% a year and LQDM charges 0.54%, so BUCK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BUCK against LQDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/buck-vs-lqdm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.