Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BUCK vs LQTI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year LQTI paid 8.5% of its price in cash against BUCK’s 6.9%, though BUCK returned more with it reinvested.

Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF.

6.9%BUCK cash paid, 1 year
8.5%LQTI cash paid, 1 year
+4.9%BUCK total return, 1 year
−1.4%LQTI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BUCK scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BUCK 72.8LQTI 50.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BUCK9.6 pts ahead of TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%BUCK+4.9%6.9% of it arrived as cash9.6 pts ahead of TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%BUCK+4.9%6.9% cash9.6 pts ahead of TLT
LQTI0.6 pts ahead of LQD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
LQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQDTotal return, distributions reinvestedLQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BUCK and LQTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BUCKOnly in LQTI
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 100.00%2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Gr 98.40%
US Dollar 0.83%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/2026 0.43%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.43%
2026-09-25 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Gr -0.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BUCK and LQTI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BUCKLQTIBUCKLQTIBUCKLQTI
3 months+1.1%−2.5%1.5%2.2%+6.3 pts+0.4 pts
6 months+2.4%−0.2%3.2%4.4%+5.5 pts+0.3 pts
1 year+4.9%−1.4%6.9%8.5%+9.6 pts+0.6 pts
3 years+16.4%not published21.6%not published+17.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+21.1%+4.7%25.4%13.4%+23.1 pts+0.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BUCK and LQTI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
Option income on TLT, paying monthly
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
Option income on LQD, paying monthly
IssuerSimplifyFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
Benchmark20+ Year Treasury (TLT)US investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.2%9.2%
Expense ratio0.35%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year6.9%8.5%
Price change, 1 year−2.2%−9.7%
Total return, 1 year+4.9%−1.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year−4.7%−2.0%
Ahead or behind+9.6 pts+0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1421 days582 days
Net assets$510m$242m

BUCK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BUCK paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly.

LQTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQTI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BUCK or LQTI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BUCK paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and LQTI paid 8.5%, so LQTI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BUCK or LQTI?
With every distribution reinvested, BUCK returned +4.9% and LQTI returned −1.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BUCK returned more.
Which is cheaper, BUCK or LQTI?
BUCK charges 0.35% a year and LQTI charges 0.65%, so BUCK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BUCK against LQTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BUCK against LQTI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/buck-vs-lqti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources