Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BAGY vs BCCC: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year BCCC paid 24.2% of its price in cash against BAGY’s 20.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF.

20.3%BAGY cash paid, 1 year
24.2%BCCC cash paid, 1 year
−40.2%BAGY total return, 1 year
−25.1%BCCC total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BAGY 18.3BCCC 50.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BAGY9.2 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBIT
BCCC5.9 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAGY and BCCC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BAGYOnly in BCCC
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 45.60%CASH 60.21%
Cash & Other 23.34%4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49%
United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 18.11%VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 C 17.25%4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19%
United States Treasury Bill 09/29/2026 1.45%OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60%
MBTX 09/22/2026 188.42 C -2.58%4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 P -3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BAGY and BCCC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BAGYBCCCBAGYBCCCBAGYBCCC
3 months+11.0%+19.2%7.4%7.7%−18.2 pts−10.0 pts
6 months−2.5%+9.2%14.9%14.4%−18.2 pts−6.6 pts
1 year−40.2%−25.1%20.3%24.2%−9.2 pts+5.9 pts
Since launch−23.5%−15.4%34.9%35.2%−8.4 pts+7.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BAGY and BCCC on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
IssuerAmplifyGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized29.9%29.1%
Expense ratio0.65%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year20.3%24.2%
Price change, 1 year−57.9%−48.5%
Total return, 1 year−40.2%−25.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%−31.1%
Ahead or behind−9.2 pts+5.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age507 days471 days
Net assets$11m$9m

BAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BAGY paid 20.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 57.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −40.2%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid monthly.

BCCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BAGY or BCCC?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BAGY paid 20.3% of its starting price in cash and BCCC paid 24.2%, so BCCC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BAGY or BCCC?
With every distribution reinvested, BAGY returned −40.2% and BCCC returned −25.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BCCC returned more.
Which is cheaper, BAGY or BCCC?
BAGY charges 0.65% a year and BCCC charges 0.75%, so BAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAGY against BCCC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAGY against BCCC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bagy-vs-bccc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources