Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACYS vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+0.4 pts
6 months to Nov 12, 2026: ACYS ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.02 pts
A year: ACYS 0.75%, SBAR 0.77%, per filings dated Apr 23, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACYS costs 0.02 points a year less; ACYS is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACYS vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACYSSBAR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+7.5%
Price changerose 1.1% (since Apr 23, 2026)fell 4.8% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate16% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment77% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.77%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$671m$441m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.3%
ACYS cash paid, since launch, Apr 23, 2026
11.8%
SBAR cash paid, 1 year
+4.4%
ACYS total return, since launch, Apr 23, 2026
+7.5%
SBAR total return, 1 year
ACYS · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 2.8 pts ahead of IWM
ACYS
+4.4%
IWM
+1.6%

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

IWM

+1.6%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.3% of it arrived as cash

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

IWM

+1.6%

ACYS

+4.4%

2.8 pts ahead of IWM

3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYS since launch: paid 3.3%, price +1.1%, total +4.4%, IWM +1.6%, +2.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SBAR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
SBAR
+7.5%
none

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% as cash

11.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM, paying monthly SBAR Simplify Barrier Income ETF · Defined income, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) not set
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.0% 12.0%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.77%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.3% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) 11.8%
Price change, 1 year +1.1% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) −4.8%
Total return, 1 year +4.4% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) +7.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +1.6% (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind +2.8 pts (since launch, Apr 23, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 16% 77%
Age 203 days 1.6 years
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $671m $441m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACYS vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYSSBARACYSSBARACYSSBAR
3 months+1.0%−0.8%2.0%2.9%+9.0 ptsnot measured
6 months+3.1%+2.7%3.2%5.8%+4.7 ptsnot measured
1 year–+7.5%–11.8%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACYS Apr 2026 · SBAR Apr 2025+4.4%+19.7%3.3%19.0%+2.8 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACYS and SBAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACYS

Over the period from its first trade on Apr 23, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYS paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.8 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 16% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SBAR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SBAR paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYS or SBAR?
ACYS charges 0.75% a year and SBAR charges 0.77%, so ACYS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACYS against SBAR, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-sbar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACYS and SBAR both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACYS and SBAR

Total return, distributions reinvested, 6 months.

ACYS +3.1%SBAR +2.7%
May 14, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACYS +3.1%, SBAR +2.7%: ACYS +0.4 pts ahead, 6 months, May 14, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.