ACYQ vs PLA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACYQ and PLA both write options for income. FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF.

1.9%
ACYQ cash paid, since launch
6.9%
PLA cash paid, since launch
+8.0%
ACYQ total return, since launch
+11.1%
PLA total return, since launch
ACYQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.7 pts ahead of SPY
ACYQ
+8.0%
SPY
+4.3%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

PLA · since launch to Sep 30, 202627.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA
+11.1%
PLTR
+38.3%

27.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

PLTR

+38.3%

PLA

+11.1%

6.9% as cash

27.2 pts behind PLTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

27.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

PLTR

+38.3%

PLA

+11.1%

27.2 pts behind PLTR

6.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +38.3%. PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYQPLAACYQPLAACYQPLA
3 months+6.0%+11.5%1.8%3.5%+3.5 pts−37.2 pts
Since launch
ACYQ Jun 2026 · PLA May 2026
+8.0%+11.1%1.9%6.9%+3.7 pts−27.2 pts

ACYQ and PLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACYQ
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
PLA
GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · Autocallable on PLTR, paying monthly
Issuer First Trust GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Palantir (PLTR)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 21.0% 19.3%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 1.9% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026) 6.9% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +6.0% +3.7%
Total return, 1 year +8.0% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026) +11.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +4.3% +38.3%
Ahead or behind +3.7 pts −27.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 0%
Age 98 days 134 days
Net assets $78m $4m

ACYQ and PLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACYQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 24, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYQ paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +4.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid periodically.

PLA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, PLA paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.1%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +38.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 27.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.3%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYQ or PLA?
ACYQ charges 0.75% a year and PLA charges 1.07%, so ACYQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACYQ against PLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyq-vs-pla

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.