ACSP vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and MRA both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
13.7% as cash
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
Total return, distributions reinvested
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +4.6%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | MRA | ACSP | MRA | ACSP | MRA |
| 3 months | not published | +7.2% | not published | 7.5% | not published | +22.4 pts |
| Since launch ACSP Aug 2026 · MRA May 2026 | −3.9% | +4.6% | 0.0% | 13.7% | −2.4 pts | +25.5 pts |
ACSP and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACSP and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
MRA in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACSP against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-mra
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-mra Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACSP against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-mra
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACSP against MRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-mra
- Markdown
- [ACSP against MRA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-mra)