Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACQQ vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+15.0 pts
1 month to Nov 12, 2026: SBAR ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.05 pts
A year: ACQQ 0.72%, SBAR 0.77%, per filings dated Jul 23, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACQQ costs 0.05 points a year less; SBAR is 11.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACQQ vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACQQSBAR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+7.5%
Price changefell 17.9% (since Aug 14, 2026)fell 4.8% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate88% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment77% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.77%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$38m$441m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.3%
ACQQ cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
11.8%
SBAR cash paid, 1 year
−15.0%
ACQQ total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
+7.5%
SBAR total return, 1 year
ACQQ · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 9.2 pts behind QQQ
ACQQ
−15.0%
QQQ
−5.8%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

−5.8%

ACQQ

−15.0%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.2 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

−5.8%

ACQQ

−15.0%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SBAR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
SBAR
+7.5%
none

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ SBAR Simplify Barrier Income ETF · Defined income, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) not set
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 18.8% 12.0%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.77%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.3% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) 11.8%
Price change, 1 year −17.9% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −4.8%
Total return, 1 year −15.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +7.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year −5.8% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind −9.2 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 88% 77%
Age 90 days 1.6 years
Net assets, ACQQ as of Nov 12, 2026 and SBAR as of Nov 11, 2026 $38m $441m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACQQ vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACQQSBARACQQSBARACQQSBAR
3 months–−0.8%–2.9%–not measured
6 months–+2.7%–5.8%–not measured
1 year–+7.5%–11.8%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACQQ Aug 2026 · SBAR Apr 2025−15.0%+19.7%3.3%19.0%−9.2 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACQQ and SBAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACQQ

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −15.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −5.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.8%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 88% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SBAR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SBAR paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or SBAR?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and SBAR charges 0.77%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACQQ against SBAR, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-sbar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACQQ and SBAR both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACQQ and SBAR

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACQQ −15.8%SBAR −0.8%
Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACQQ −15.8%, SBAR −0.8%: SBAR +15.0 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.