ACQQ vs CAGE: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and CAGE both write options for income. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF.
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and CAGE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACQQ | CAGE | ACQQ | CAGE | ACQQ | CAGE |
| 3 months | not published | +3.7% | not published | 0.0% | not published | +1.1 pts |
| Since launch ACQQ Aug 2026 · CAGE Apr 2026 | +1.6% | +14.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3 pts | +5.2 pts |
ACQQ and CAGE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACQQ and CAGE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
CAGE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACQQ against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cage
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cage Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACQQ against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cage
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACQQ against CAGE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cage
- Markdown
- [ACQQ against CAGE (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cage)