Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACQQ vs EGGY: which paid, and which earned it?

ACQQ and EGGY both write options for income.

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF.

0.0%ACQQ cash paid, 1 year
28.1%EGGY cash paid, 1 year
−2.1%ACQQ total return, 1 year
+15.3%EGGY total return, 1 year
ACQQ0.8 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQ
EGGY1.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% as cash1.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and EGGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACQQOnly in EGGY
NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%Seagate Technology Holdings PL 12.31%
Bloom Energy Corp 10.77%
Micron Technology Inc 7.95%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 6.86%
Astera Labs Inc 6.85%
Coherent Corp 5.81%
Vertiv Holdings Co 5.60%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACQQ and EGGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACQQEGGYACQQEGGYACQQEGGY
3 monthsnot published−15.1%not published7.1%not published−17.3 pts
6 monthsnot published+27.6%not published19.4%not published+9.6 pts
1 yearnot published+15.3%not published28.1%not published−1.2 pts
Since launch−2.1%+42.3%0.0%45.5%−0.8 pts+11.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACQQ and EGGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesNest Egg
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published34.8%
Expense ratio0.72%0.92%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)28.1%
Price change, 1 year−2.1%−16.2%
Total return, 1 year−2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+15.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.3%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days630 days
Net assets$23m$126m

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

EGGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or EGGY?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and EGGY charges 0.92%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACQQ against EGGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against EGGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-eggy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources