GSOL vs QSOL: which tracked its coin?
GSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days, so its difference from Solana is not comparable with QSOL’s. Grayscale Solana Staking ETF and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF.
GSOL over 1 year: fund −44.43%, Solana −43.44%, thinly traded so not compared.
QSOL since launch: fund −4.57%, Solana −7.62%, 3.05 pts ahead of Solana.
The same coin, two trusts
GSOL and QSOL hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Solana through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. GSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days, so its distance from Solana is a quote nobody moved rather than a cost a holder paid, and ETFIQ neither prints it nor ranks it. GSOL has 963 more days of record than QSOL, and a longer record is a longer window over which a cost can show itself.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | The coin over the same days | Difference, percentage points | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GSOL | QSOL | GSOL | QSOL | GSOL | QSOL |
| 1 month | +13.3% | +13.4% | +14.6% | +14.6% | not comparable | −1.2 pts |
| 3 months | +53.9% | +53.9% | +52.6% | +52.6% | not comparable | +1.4 pts |
| 6 months | −36.3% | +41.8% | −39.1% | +45.4% | not comparable | −2.5% of its growth |
| 1 year | −44.4% | not published | −43.4% | not published | not comparable | not published |
| Since each listed GSOL Apr 2023 · QSOL Dec 2025 | +101.5% | −4.6% | +428.6% | −7.6% | not comparable | +3.0 pts |
GSOL and QSOL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
GSOL and QSOL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GSOL in plain words
GSOL holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, Solana moved −43.4% and GSOL returned −44.4%. That leaves it not comparable. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. GSOL closed unchanged on 50 of its 717 trading days. A price that does not move is a price nobody traded at, so its difference against Solana describes the days somebody did trade rather than the fund, and ETFIQ does not rank it against funds that trade every day. Solana is a proof of stake chain, so a fund holding it can stake. GSOL’s own filings say it does (424B3, Aug 7, 2026). Over the window ETFIQ measures it did not finish ahead of Solana’s own price, so whatever it earned did not cover its costs. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Solana it custodies.
QSOL in plain words
QSOL holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 30, 2026, Solana moved −7.6% and QSOL returned −4.6%. That leaves it 3.0 percentage points ahead. QSOL charges 0.25% a year and finished 3.0% ahead of Solana, which a fee cannot do on its own. QSOL’s own filings say it does (10-Q, Aug 7, 2026). What the prices show is that it finished 3.0% ahead of Solana’s own price over the same days, against +3.4% for the other 7 funds holding Solana. After a fee, an in-kind ETP ahead of the asset it holds got there by staking.
Questions people ask
- Can GSOL and QSOL be compared on tracking?
- GSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days. A price that does not move is a price nobody traded at, so the difference from Solana describes the days somebody did trade rather than the fund, and ETFIQ publishes it nowhere and ranks it against nothing.
- Do GSOL or QSOL pay a staking yield?
- Solana is a proof of stake chain, so staking is possible. Whether either trust stakes, and what the sponsor keeps of it, is a term in its own filings and is read from those rather than assumed.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, GSOL against QSOL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/gsol-vs-qsol
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GSOL against QSOL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/gsol-vs-qsol Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, GSOL against QSOL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/gsol-vs-qsol
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). GSOL against QSOL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/gsol-vs-qsol
- Markdown
- [GSOL against QSOL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/gsol-vs-qsol)