Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PAPR vs PMAP: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 PAPR can fall 8.3% before its buffer engages and PMAP 3.9%.

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Apr and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April.

8.3%PAPR can fall this far before its buffer
3.9%PMAP can fall this far before its buffer
4.6%PAPR can still gain
3.0%PMAP can still gain
PAPRAt its cap
15 pts+14% gained−15.0% floor0% period start+14.0% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%−15.0% floor0% start+14.0% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%
PMAPAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+7.1% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+7.1% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%

These are two different products. PMAP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. PAPR is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

PAPR resets first, on Mar 31, 2027, 191 days from now; PMAP runs to Mar 31, 2027, 191 days. PAPR can still gain 4.6% before its cap, PMAP 3.0%. A fall from here reaches PAPR’s buffer after 8.3% and PMAP’s after 3.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PAPR and PMAP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PAPRPMAPPAPRPMAP
3 months+2.0%+1.2%−0.3 pts−1.0 pts
6 months+9.1%+3.6%−8.9 pts−14.4 pts
1 year+12.2%+6.1%−4.3 pts−10.4 pts
3 years+38.1%not published−40.3 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PAPR and PMAP on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Apr
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.0%, over a period ending Mar 31, 2027
PMAP
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.1%, over a period ending Mar 31, 2027
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%100%
Outcome periodMar 31, 2026 to Mar 31, 2027Apr 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2027
Days left191191
Starting cap+14.0%+7.1%
Can still gain4.6%3.0%
Fall before buffer8.3%3.9%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+19.0%+19.0%
Fund return this period+8.6%+3.5%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.79%0.50%
Net assets$960m$5m

PAPR in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +14.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 4.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 8.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 191 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PMAP in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.1% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PAPR or PMAP?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PAPR can gain about 4.6% before its cap and PMAP about 3.0%, so PAPR has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PAPR or PMAP?
PAPR ends its outcome period on Mar 31, 2027 and PMAP on Mar 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PAPR or PMAP?
PAPR charges 0.79% a year and PMAP charges 0.50%, so PMAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PAPR against PMAP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PAPR against PMAP, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/papr-vs-pmap Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources