BAPR vs PMAP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 BAPR can fall 11.5% before its buffer engages and PMAP 4.2%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $417m for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr and $5m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April.
PMAP costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.0 points; BAPR is far larger, $417m against $5m.
| BAPR | PMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $417m | $5m |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +6.3% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 16.5% | |
BAPR: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +12.4%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
BAPR: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +12.4%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
PMAP: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer Floor; cap +7.1%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. PMAP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. BAPR is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are already at their cap, so neither gains from more rise in the index before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
BAPR resets first, on Mar 31, 2027, 173 days from now; PMAP runs to Mar 31, 2027, 173 days. BAPR can still gain 5.0% before its cap, PMAP 2.7%. A fall from here reaches BAPR’s buffer after 11.5% and PMAP’s after 4.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAPR | PMAP | BAPR | PMAP |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +1.4% | −0.3 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +9.0% | +3.0% | −5.6 pts | −11.6 pts |
| 1 year | +17.3% | +6.3% | +1.3 pts | −9.7 pts |
| 3 years | +55.5% | not published | −23.7 pts | not published |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAPR in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +18.5% for the period on Oct 9, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 5.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 11.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 173 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
PMAP in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.1% for the period on Oct 9, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, BAPR against PMAP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bapr-vs-pmap
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BAPR against PMAP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bapr-vs-pmap
[BAPR against PMAP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bapr-vs-pmap)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.