ARLU vs PMAP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 ARLU can fall 13.6% before its buffer engages and PMAP 4.2%. Net assets: $56m on Oct 8, 2026 for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Apr, and $5m on Oct 9, 2026 for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April.
PMAP costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; ARLU is 11.2 times larger.
| ARLU | PMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $56m | $5m |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.0% | +6.3% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 16.5% | |
ARLU: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +14.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
ARLU: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +14.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
PMAP: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer Floor; cap +7.1%; At its cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. PMAP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. ARLU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
PMAP is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
ARLU resets first, on Mar 31, 2027, 173 days from now; PMAP runs to Mar 31, 2027, 173 days. A fall from here reaches ARLU’s buffer after 13.6% and PMAP’s after 4.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ARLU | PMAP | ARLU | PMAP |
| 3 months | +2.3% | +1.4% | −0.9 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +11.4% | +3.0% | −3.1 pts | −11.6 pts |
| 1 year | +10.0% | +6.3% | −6.0 pts | −9.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARLU in plain words
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 13.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 173 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
PMAP in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.1% for the period on Oct 9, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, ARLU against PMAP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-pmap
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ARLU against PMAP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-pmap
[ARLU against PMAP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-pmap)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.