ARLU vs FLAO: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 ARLU can fall 13.6% before its buffer engages and FLAO 6.3%. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $56m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Apr and $9m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF - Apr.
Both cost 0.74% a year; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points; ARLU is 6.4 times larger.
| ARLU | FLAO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $56m | $9m |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.0% | +3.5% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 16.5% | 6.9% |
ARLU: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +14.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
ARLU: reference +19.7% since period start, fund +14.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
FLAO: reference +2.1% since period start, fund +1.0%; buffer −5 to floor; cap +7.1%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
FLAO: reference +2.1% since period start, fund +1.0%; buffer −5 to floor; cap +7.1%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. FLAO is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. ARLU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are AllianzIM funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
ARLU resets first, on Mar 31, 2027, 173 days from now; FLAO runs to Mar 31, 2027, 173 days. A fall from here reaches ARLU’s buffer after 13.6% and FLAO’s after 6.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ARLU | FLAO | ARLU | FLAO |
| 3 months | +2.3% | +2.3% | −0.9 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +11.4% | +5.3% | −3.1 pts | −9.3 pts |
| 1 year | +10.0% | +3.5% | −6.0 pts | −12.5 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARLU in plain words
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 13.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 173 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
FLAO in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 6.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 95.0% of the 95.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, ARLU against FLAO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-flao
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ARLU against FLAO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-flao
[ARLU against FLAO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/arlu-vs-flao)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.