Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CTJL vs JULW: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 JULW can fall 2.8% before its buffer engages and CTJL 2.1%, and JULW resets 2 days sooner.

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jul.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTJL scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

CTJL 98.3JULW 95.70.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CTJLBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+12.2% more to the cap−30.0% floor0% period start+14.3% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%30 pts of buffer−30.0% floor0% start+14.3% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%
JULWBetween buffer and cap
20 pts of buffer+3.6%+8.5% to cap−20.0% floor0% period start+12.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%20 pts−20.0% floor0% start+12.2% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

Where each one stands today

JULW resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 283 days from now; CTJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 285 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 2.1% and JULW’s after 2.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

CTJL and JULW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
CTJLJULWCTJLJULW
3 monthsnot published+1.7%not published−0.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+7.1%not published−11.0 pts
1 yearnot published+8.1%not published−8.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+38.5%not published−39.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CTJL and JULW on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTJL
Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series
Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.3%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
JULW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jul
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerCorgiAllianzIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer30%20%
Outcome periodJul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left285283
Starting cap+14.3%+12.2%
Can still gainnot published9.1%
Fall before buffer2.1%2.8%
Protection left, index points30.0% of 30.0%20.0% of 20.0%
Index return this period+2.1%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.0%+2.1%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.74%
Net assets$1m$254m

CTJL in plain words

The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 285 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JULW in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 283 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CTJL or JULW?
CTJL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and JULW on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CTJL or JULW?
CTJL charges 0.30% a year and JULW charges 0.74%, so CTJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTJL against JULW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTJL against JULW, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-julw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources