Which resets first, CTJL or JULW?

CTJL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and JULW on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.

Which is cheaper, CTJL or JULW?

CTJL charges 0.30% a year and JULW charges 0.74%, so CTJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Buffer ETFs

CTJL vs JULW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share on X Download as PDF

JULW can fall 3.1% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CTJL 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CTJL and JULW

Net assets: $1.3m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series, and $254m on Nov 3, 2026 for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jul.

CTJL on its own →JULW on its own →

At a glance

CTJL Between buffer and cap

CTJL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.6%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.

JULW Between buffer and cap

JULW: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.4%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.2%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CTJL costs 0.44 points a year less; JULW is far larger, $254m against $1.3m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CTJL vs JULW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Measure	CTJL	JULW
Return
Measure	CTJL	JULW
Total return, 1 year	not published	+8.3%
Drawdown
Measure	CTJL	JULW
Index fall to the buffer	1.1%	2.6%
Benchmark
Measure	CTJL	JULW
What it tracks	SPY	SPY
Cost and size
Measure	CTJL	JULW
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$1.3m	$254m
Holdings
Measure	CTJL	JULW
Holdings in common	not published

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · CTJL scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

IQ Buffer Score98.5CTJL93.7JULW

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

CTJL 98.5

JULW 93.7

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CTJL vs JULW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
	Total return		Gap to the reference's price return
Window	CTJL	JULW	CTJL	JULW
3 months	+0.4%	+0.8%	+0.8 pts	+1.1 pts
6 months	–	+3.4%	–	−1.1 pts
1 year	–	+8.3%	–	−5.2 pts
3 years	–	+40.4%	–	−36.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: CTJL Jul 2026 · JULW Jul 2020	+2.3%	+71.7%	−0.7 pts	−75.3 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CTJL Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.3%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027 JULW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jul · Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027

Issuer Corgi AllianzIM

Reference index SPY SPY

Buffer 30% 20%

Outcome period Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027

Days left 239 238

Starting cap +14.3% +12.2%

Can still gain not published 8.8%

Fall before buffer 1.1% 3.1%

Protection left, index points 30.0% of 30.0% 20.0% of 20.0%

Index return this period +1.2% +2.7%

Fund return this period +1.6% +2.4%

State today Open Open

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.74%

Net assets, CTJL as of Nov 4, 2026 and JULW as of Nov 3, 2026 $1.3m $254m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

JULW resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; CTJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 1.1% and JULW’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Alert

About each fund

CTJL

The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JULW

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 8.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CTJL or JULW?: CTJL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and JULW on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CTJL or JULW?: CTJL charges 0.30% a year and JULW charges 0.74%, so CTJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CTJL vs UJUL CTJL vs ZJUL CTJL vs DJUN CTJL vs DDFL JULW vs PJUL JULW vs HJLY JULW vs PMJL JULW vs JUNM

Where to next

SPY →CTJL on its own →JULW on its own →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CTJL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

Corgi website ↗

JULW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

AllianzIM page for JULW ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CTJL against JULW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-julw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.