Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CJUN vs CTJN: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 CJUN can fall 0.4% before its buffer engages and CTJN 0.4%.

Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF and Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTJN scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

CJUN 84.3CTJN 99.80.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CJUNBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+13.5% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+13.9% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+13.9% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%
CTJNBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+13.7% more to the cap−30.0% floor0% period start+14.1% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%30 pts of buffer−30.0% floor0% start+14.1% capTODAY · SPY +0.4%

Both are Corgi funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

CJUN resets first, on May 31, 2027, 255 days from now; CTJN runs to May 31, 2027, 255 days. A fall from here reaches CJUN’s buffer after 0.4% and CTJN’s after 0.4%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

CJUN and CTJN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
CJUNCTJNCJUNCTJN
3 months+1.6%+1.4%−0.6 pts−0.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CJUN and CTJN on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CJUN
Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.9%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
CTJN
Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.1%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
IssuerCorgiCorgi
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%30%
Outcome periodJun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027
Days left255255
Starting cap+13.9%+14.1%
Can still gainnot publishednot published
Fall before buffer0.4%0.4%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%30.0% of 30.0%
Index return this period+0.4%+0.4%
Fund return this period+1.7%+1.0%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.30%
Net assets$1m$1m

CJUN in plain words

The fund's price can fall 0.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 255 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

CTJN in plain words

Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CJUN or CTJN?
CJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and CTJN on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CJUN or CTJN?
CJUN charges 0.30% a year and CTJN charges 0.30%, so CJUN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CJUN against CTJN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CJUN against CTJN, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-ctjn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources