Which resets first, CJUN or CTJN?

CJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and CTJN on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.

Which is cheaper, CJUN or CTJN?

CJUN and CTJN both charge 0.30% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 3, 2026.

Buffer ETFs

CJUN vs CTJN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share on X Download as PDF

As of Nov 3, 2026 CJUN can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and CTJN 0.0%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CJUN and CTJN

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $893,966 for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF and $1.4m for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF.

CJUN on its own →CTJN on its own →

At a glance

CJUN Buffer working

CJUN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.

CTJN Buffer working

CTJN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.1%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.30% a year.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CJUN vs CTJN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Measure	CJUN	CTJN
Benchmark
Measure	CJUN	CTJN
What it tracks	SPY	SPY
Cost and size
Measure	CJUN	CTJN
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.30%
Net assets, as of Nov 4, 2026	$893,966	$1.4m
Holdings
Measure	CJUN	CTJN
Holdings in common	not published

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · CTJN scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

IQ Buffer Score72.8CJUN99.7CTJN

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

CJUN 72.8

CTJN 99.7

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CJUN vs CTJN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
	Total return		Gap to the reference's price return
Window	CJUN	CTJN	CJUN	CTJN
3 months	+0.3%	+0.2%	+0.7 pts	+0.6 pts
Since launchCJUN Jun 2026 · CTJN Jun 2026	+1.6%	+1.2%	+0.6 pts	+0.3 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CJUN Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.9%, over a period ending May 31, 2027 CTJN Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF · Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.1%, over a period ending May 31, 2027

Issuer Corgi Corgi

Reference index SPY SPY

Buffer 15% 30%

Outcome period Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027 Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027

Days left 209 209

Starting cap +13.9% +14.1%

Can still gain not published not published

Fall before buffer 0.0% 0.0%

Protection left, index points 14.4% of 15.0% 29.4% of 30.0%

Index return this period −0.6% −0.6%

Fund return this period +1.2% +0.5%

State today Buffer working Buffer working

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.30%

Net assets, as of Nov 4, 2026 $893,966 $1.4m

As of Nov 3, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Both are Corgi funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

CJUN resets first, on May 31, 2027, 209 days from now; CTJN runs to May 31, 2027, 209 days. A fall from here reaches CJUN’s buffer after 0.0% and CTJN’s after 0.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Alert

About each fund

CJUN

Protection left, in index points: 14.4% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 209 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

CTJN

Protection left, in index points: 29.4% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CJUN or CTJN?: CJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and CTJN on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CJUN or CTJN?: CJUN and CTJN both charge 0.30% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CJUN vs JUNC CJUN vs CPSU CJUN vs FMAY CJUN vs HJUN CTJN vs JUNC CTJN vs HJUN CTJN vs PMJN CTJN vs DLMY

Where to next

SPY →CJUN on its own →CTJN on its own →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Corgi website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CJUN against CTJN, data as of Nov 3, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-ctjn

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.