Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CTJN vs DLMY: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
DLMY can fall 4.5% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CTJN 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CTJN and DLMY
Net assets: $1.4m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF, and $12m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - May.
CTJN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.1%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CTJN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +14.1%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.DLMY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +14.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DLMY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +14.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CTJN costs 0.55 points a year less; DLMY is 8.6 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CTJN | DLMY |
|---|---|---|
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 3.6% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.4m | $12m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTJN | DLMY | CTJN | DLMY |
| 3 months | +0.2% | +0.8% | +0.6 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CTJN Jun 2026 · DLMY May 2026 | +1.2% | +3.6% | +0.3 pts | −0.2 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. DLMY is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CTJN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DLMY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 198 days from now; CTJN runs to May 31, 2027, 209 days. A fall from here reaches CTJN’s buffer after 0.0% and DLMY’s after 4.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CTJN
Protection left, in index points: 29.4% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 209 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
DLMY
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 4.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 198 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CTJN against DLMY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjn-vs-dlmy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CTJN against DLMY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjn-vs-dlmy
[CTJN against DLMY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjn-vs-dlmy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.