Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CJUN vs CPSU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
CPSU can fall 1.6% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CJUN 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CJUN and CPSU
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $893,966 for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF and $30m for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June.
CJUN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CJUN: reference −0.6% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.CPSU: reference +1.1% since period start, fund +1.4%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CJUN costs 0.39 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CJUN | CPSU |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +4.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.1% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.69% |
| Net assets | $893,966 | $30m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUN | CPSU | CJUN | CPSU |
| 3 months | +0.3% | +0.6% | +0.7 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +1.7% | – | −2.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | +4.7% | – | −8.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CJUN Jun 2026 · CPSU Jun 2025 | +1.6% | +7.9% | +0.6 pts | −21.4 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. CPSU is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CPSU resets first, on May 28, 2027, 205 days from now; CJUN runs to May 31, 2027, 209 days. A fall from here reaches CJUN’s buffer after 0.0% and CPSU’s after 1.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CJUN
Protection left, in index points: 14.4% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 209 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
CPSU
The fund's price can fall 1.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 205 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUN against CPSU, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-cpsu
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CJUN against CPSU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-cpsu
[CJUN against CPSU (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-cpsu)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.