Which resets first, CJUN or DDTZ?

CJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and DDTZ on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.

Which is cheaper, CJUN or DDTZ?

CJUN charges 0.30% a year and DDTZ charges 0.79%, so CJUN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

CJUN vs DDTZ: which one stands where?

As of Oct 2, 2026 DDTZ can fall 2.9% before its buffer engages and CJUN 1.4%. Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jun.

CJUN costs 0.49 points a year less; DDTZ is 22.6 times larger.

	CJUN	DDTZ
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.79%
Net assets	$1m	$32m
What it tracks	SPY	SPY
Holdings in common	not published

CJUNBetween buffer and cap

CJUN: reference +1.5% since period start, fund +2.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Between buffer and cap.

DDTZBetween buffer and cap

DDTZ: reference +1.7% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.4%; Between buffer and cap.

These are two different products. DDTZ is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

CJUN resets first, on May 31, 2027, 241 days from now; DDTZ runs to May 31, 2027, 241 days. A fall from here reaches CJUN’s buffer after 1.4% and DDTZ’s after 2.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Gap to the reference
Window	CJUN	DDTZ	CJUN	DDTZ
3 months	+2.4%	+3.2%	−1.2 pts	−0.3 pts

CJUN and DDTZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CJUN

Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.9%, over a period ending May 31, 2027

DDTZ

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jun · Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.4%, over a period ending May 31, 2027

Issuer Corgi Innovator

Reference index SPY SPY

Buffer 15% 10%

Outcome period Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027 May 31, 2026 to May 31, 2027

Days left 241 241

Starting cap +13.9% +15.4%

Can still gain not published 12.1%

Fall before buffer 1.4% 2.9%

Protection left, index points 15.0% of 15.0% 10.0% of 10.0%

Index return this period +1.5% +1.7%

Fund return this period +2.4% +2.7%

State today Open Open

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.79%

Net assets $1m $32m

CJUN and DDTZ on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CJUN in plain words

The fund's price can fall 1.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 241 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

DDTZ in plain words

From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CJUN or DDTZ?: CJUN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and DDTZ on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CJUN or DDTZ?: CJUN charges 0.30% a year and DDTZ charges 0.79%, so CJUN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CJUN vs DDFZ CJUN vs DLMY CJUN vs DMAY CJUN vs FMAY DDTZ vs DLMY DDTZ vs DMAY DDTZ vs FMAY DDTZ vs GMAY

SPY →CJUN on its own →DDTZ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

Corgi website ↗DDTZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗Innovator page for DDTZ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CJUN against DDTZ, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-ddtz

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.