CJUN vs PMJN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 CJUN can fall 2.5% before its buffer engages and PMJN 2.0%. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF and $10m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June.
CJUN costs 0.20 points a year less; PMJN is 7.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CJUN | PMJN | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $1m | $10m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +5.2% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.5% | 2.8% |
CJUN: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CJUN: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.9%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
PMJN: reference +2.9% since period start, fund +1.5%; buffer Floor; cap +7.4%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
These are two different products. PMJN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CJUN resets first, on May 31, 2027, 230 days from now; PMJN runs to May 31, 2027, 230 days. A fall from here reaches CJUN’s buffer after 2.5% and PMJN’s after 2.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUN | PMJN | CJUN | PMJN |
| 3 months | +2.6% | +1.5% | −0.9 pts | −2.0 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +2.3% | not published | −9.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.2% | not published | −12.2 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: CJUN Jun 2026 · PMJN Jun 2025 | +2.5% | +8.3% | 0.0 pts | −23.0 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CJUN
The fund's price can fall 2.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 230 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About PMJN
From its price on Oct 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUN against PMJN, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-pmjn
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). CJUN against PMJN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-pmjn
[CJUN against PMJN (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjun-vs-pmjn)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.