Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

BAPR vs MARM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 BAPR can fall 11.4% before its buffer engages and MARM 4.9%, and MARM resets 12 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BAPR and MARM

Net assets: $417m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr, and $105m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March.

At a glance
11.4%
BAPR can fall this far before its buffer
4.9%
MARM can fall this far before its buffer
5.0%
BAPR can still gain
1.9%
MARM can still gain
BAPR Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capBAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +12.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.9 pts+17.9% gained−9.0% floor0% period start+18.5% cap+0.6% more to the capTODAY · SPY +17.9%Between buffer and capBAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +12.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.−9.0% floor0% start+18.5% cap9 pts of buffer+17.9% gain captured+0.6% more to the capTODAY · SPY +17.9%

BAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +12.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

BAPR: reference +17.9% since period start, fund +12.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.5%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MARM At its cap
At its capMARM: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +4.2%; buffer 0 to −78; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.77.8 pts of buffer+7%−77.8% floor0% period start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +18.2%At its capMARM: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +4.2%; buffer 0 to −78; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.77.8 pts of buffer−77.8% floor0% start+7.0% cap+7% gain capturedTODAY · SPY +18.2%

MARM: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +4.2%; buffer 0 to −78; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MARM: reference +18.2% since period start, fund +4.2%; buffer 0 to −78; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

BAPR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; BAPR is 3.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BAPR vs MARM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureBAPRMARM
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+6.3%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer15.1%15.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.85%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$414m$105m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · MARM scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score15.4BAPR92MARM

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 134 weekly returns · each against SPY
BAPR MARM
Return
Total return edge BAPR +37.3% +19.1%
Annualized edge BAPR +13.1% +7.0%
Price return edge BAPR +37.3% +19.1%
Risk
Volatility edge MARM 9.3% 2.6%
Max drawdown edge MARM −13.8% −1.5%
Downside capture 59.8% 11.4%
Beta 0.61 0.16
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MARM (slight) 0.91 0.98
Sortino edge MARM (slight) 1.36 1.50
Treynor 0.139 0.160
Calmar edge MARM 0.95 4.56
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.48 0.75
Information ratio −0.65 −0.81
Tracking error 6.3% 12.4%
Reading

From Apr 2024 to Oct 2026, BAPR returned more: +37.3% to +19.1%. MARM swung less: 2.6% to 9.3%. MARM fell less at its worst: −1.5% to −13.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BAPR vs MARM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureBAPRMARMSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+37.3%+19.1%BAPRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.1%+7.0%BAPRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+37.3%+19.1%BAPRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility9.3%2.6%MARMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.2%1.7%MARMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−13.8%−1.5%MARMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture49.6%13.7%100.0%BAPRShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture59.8%11.4%100.0%MARMShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.610.161.00MARM lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.801.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.910.98MARM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.361.50MARM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1390.1600.125MARMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.954.56MARMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+0.5% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.480.75Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.5% to +4.2%−0.9% to +2.0%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.65−0.81BAPRReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.3%12.4%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 134 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: BAPR vs MARM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowBAPRMARMBAPRMARM
3 months+1.6%+1.0%+2.0 pts+1.4 pts
6 months+4.8%+2.2%+0.3 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+16.7%+6.3%+3.2 pts−7.3 pts
3 years+55.1%–−21.3 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: BAPR Apr 2019 · MARM Mar 2024+117.7%+19.2%−50.5 pts−27.4 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr · Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.5%, over a period ending Mar 31, 2027 MARM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March · Absorbs the first 78% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.0%, over a period ending Mar 19, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 9% 78%
Outcome period Mar 31, 2026 to Mar 31, 2027 Mar 23, 2026 to Mar 19, 2027
Days left 147 135
Starting cap +18.5% +7.0%
Can still gain 5.0% 1.9%
Fall before buffer 11.4% 4.9%
Protection left, index points 9.0% of 9.0% 77.8% of 77.8%
Index return this period +17.9% +18.2%
Fund return this period +12.3% +4.2%
State today Open At cap
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.85%
Net assets, BAPR as of Nov 4, 2026 and MARM as of Nov 3, 2026 $417m $105m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MARM is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.

Where each one stands today

MARM resets first, on Mar 19, 2027, 135 days from now; BAPR runs to Mar 31, 2027, 147 days. BAPR can still gain 5.0% before its cap, MARM 1.9%. A fall from here reaches BAPR’s buffer after 11.4% and MARM’s after 4.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

BAPR and MARM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BAPR

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 11.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 147 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

MARM

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 77.8% of the 77.8% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 135 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Mar 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, BAPR or MARM?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, BAPR can gain about 5.0% before its cap and MARM about 1.9%, so BAPR has more room left this period.
Which resets first, BAPR or MARM?
BAPR ends its outcome period on Mar 31, 2027 and MARM on Mar 19, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, BAPR or MARM?
BAPR charges 0.79% a year and MARM charges 0.85%, so BAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BAPR against MARM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bapr-vs-marm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.