Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AUGC vs JULM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
JULM can fall 2.2% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and AUGC 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AUGC and JULM
Net assets: $508,452 on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series, and $36m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July.
AUGC: reference −0.4% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
AUGC: reference −0.4% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +18.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.JULM: reference +3.1% since period start, fund +1.4%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
AUGC costs 0.55 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AUGC | JULM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +5.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 3.1% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $508,452 | $36m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AUGC | JULM | AUGC | JULM |
| 3 months | +0.1% | +0.6% | +0.5 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +2.4% | – | −2.1 pts |
| 1 year | – | +5.5% | – | −8.1 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: AUGC Aug 2026 · JULM Jul 2024 | +0.2% | +15.8% | +0.8 pts | −26.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. JULM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. AUGC is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 254 days from now; AUGC runs to Jul 31, 2027, 270 days. A fall from here reaches AUGC’s buffer after 0.0% and JULM’s after 2.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
AUGC
Protection left, in index points: 9.6% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 270 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULM
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 254 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AUGC against JULM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augc-vs-julm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AUGC against JULM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augc-vs-julm
[AUGC against JULM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augc-vs-julm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.