CPSA vs JULM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 JULM can fall 2.1% before its buffer engages and CPSA 1.3%, and JULM resets 14 days sooner. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $50m for Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - August and $36m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July.
CPSA costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; CPSA is 1.4 times larger.
| CPSA | JULM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $50m | $36m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.9% | +5.7% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.7% | 4.5% |
CPSA: reference +2.8% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer Floor; cap +7.8%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
JULM: reference +4.8% since period start, fund +1.3%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Where each one stands today
JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 280 days from now; CPSA runs to Jul 30, 2027, 294 days. A fall from here reaches CPSA’s buffer after 1.3% and JULM’s after 2.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSA | JULM | CPSA | JULM |
| 3 months | +1.5% | +1.3% | −1.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +3.8% | +3.5% | −10.8 pts | −11.0 pts |
| 1 year | +5.9% | +5.7% | −10.1 pts | −10.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CPSA in plain words
The fund's price can fall 1.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 294 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Jul 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULM in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 280 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, CPSA against JULM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsa-vs-julm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CPSA against JULM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsa-vs-julm
[CPSA against JULM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsa-vs-julm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.