Data as of .
CPSA vs JULM: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 JULM can fall 1.7% before its buffer engages and CPSA 0.8%, and JULM resets 14 days sooner.
Where each one stands today
JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 298 days from now; CPSA runs to Jul 30, 2027, 312 days. A fall from here reaches CPSA’s buffer after 0.8% and JULM’s after 1.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPSA | JULM | CPSA | JULM | |
| 3 months | +1.2% | +1.0% | −1.0 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 6 months | +4.4% | +4.2% | −13.6 pts | −13.9 pts |
| 1 year | +5.5% | +5.3% | −11.1 pts | −11.3 pts |
| CPSA Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - August Absorbs losses from 0.0% to 100.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 7.7%, over a period ending Jul 30, 2027 | JULM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.3%, over a period ending Jul 16, 2027 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Calamos | First Trust |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 0% to 100% | 100% |
| Outcome period | Aug 3, 2026 to Jul 30, 2027 | Jul 20, 2026 to Jul 16, 2027 |
| Days left | 312 | 298 |
| Starting cap | +7.7% | +7.3% |
| Can still gain | not published | 5.5% |
| Fall before buffer | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Protection left, index points | 100.0% of 100.0% | 100.0% of 100.0% |
| Index return this period | +0.5% | +4.1% |
| Fund return this period | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| State today | Open | Open |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $48m | $34m |
CPSA in plain words
The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 312 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULM in plain words
From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 298 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
- Which resets first, CPSA or JULM?
- CPSA ends its outcome period on Jul 30, 2027 and JULM on Jul 16, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, CPSA or JULM?
- CPSA charges 0.69% a year and JULM charges 0.85%, so CPSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CPSA against JULM, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsa-vs-julm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.