VO vs XMMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
VO and XMMO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned +12.4% over the year. Net assets: $103.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF, and $6.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF.
VO costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.8 points.
| VO | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.34% |
| Net assets, VO as of Sep 30, 2026 and XMMO as of Oct 20, 2026 | $103.4bn | $6.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.4% | +4.6% |
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) | S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.7% | 29.4% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 19.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
VO and XMMO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. VO follows Morningstar US Mid Cap Index (formerly CRSP US Mid Cap Index) and XMMO follows S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 VO returned +12.4% and XMMO +4.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.8 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VO and XMMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
VO and XMMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About VO
VO tracks an index of Mid-Cap. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About XMMO
XMMO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 29.4%. It sat 19.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VO or XMMO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.4% and XMMO +4.6%.
- Which is cheaper, VO or XMMO?
- VO is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VO against XMMO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-xmmo
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). VO against XMMO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-xmmo
[VO against XMMO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vo-vs-xmmo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.