Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VHT vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VHT returned +25.0% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VHT and VUSB

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $19.1bn for Vanguard Health Care ETF and $9.9bn for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.09%
VHT expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VHT costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.5 points; VHT is 1.9 times larger.

VHT vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVHTVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+3.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$19.1bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VHT and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VHT VUSB
MKTLIQ 0.24% 2.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Charles Schwab Corp 0.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Health Care Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +25.4% (FHLC) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs FHLC +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.10%
Holdings 414 1344
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.1bn $9.9bn

VHT and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VHT or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VHT returned +25.0% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, VHT or VUSB?
VHT is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VHT against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vht-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.