Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs WTMF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLT returned −4.8% to WTMF's +12.7%, and TLT charges 0.15% to WTMF's 0.66%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and WTMF

Net assets: $48.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $261m on Aug 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund.

At a glance
−4.8%
TLT total return, 1 year
+12.7%
WTMF total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.66%
WTMF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.5 points.

TLT vs WTMF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTWTMF
Return
Total return, 1 year−4.8%+12.7%
Total return, 52 weeks+11.8%
Drawdown
Below its high41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash8.1 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.66%
Net assets, TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 and WTMF as of Aug 31, 2026$48.3bn$261m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.62
Beta to the S&P 500+0.38: about 0.38% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.37%
Down-week capture34.4%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Managed futures
Total return, 1 year −4.8% +12.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −4.7% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.66%
Holdings 47 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 and WTMF as of Aug 31, 2026 $48.3bn $261m

TLT and WTMF on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.

WTMF

WTMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.62 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.38, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.38% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks WTMF fell 0.37% on average, a down-week capture of 34.4%. Over the same 52 weeks WTMF returned +11.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are TLT and WTMF in the same category?
TLT is a bond ETF and WTMF is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, TLT or WTMF?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −4.8% and WTMF +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or WTMF?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against WTMF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-wtmf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.