Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IMF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IMF returned +20.1% to TLT's −4.8%, and TLT charges 0.15% to IMF's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IMF and TLT

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $304m for Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF and $48.3bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+20.1%
IMF total return, 1 year
−4.8%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.65%
IMF expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.9 points; TLT is far larger, $48.3bn against $304m.

IMF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIMFTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+20.1%−4.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+19.2%
Drawdown
Below its high41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash15.6 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.15%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$304m$48.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.38
Beta to the S&P 500+0.24: about 0.24% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.14%
Down-week capture13.0%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Bond ETF
What it is Managed futures Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +20.1% −4.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −4.7% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 47
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $304m $48.3bn

IMF and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IMF and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IMF

IMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.38 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.24, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.24% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks IMF fell 0.14% on average, a down-week capture of 13.0%. Over the same 52 weeks IMF returned +19.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 15.6 percentage points ahead of cash.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IMF and TLT in the same category?
IMF is an alternatives ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IMF or TLT?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMF returned +20.1% and TLT −4.8%.
Which is cheaper, IMF or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IMF against TLT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imf-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.