Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BND vs WTMF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to WTMF's +12.7%, and BND charges 0.03% to WTMF's 0.66%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and WTMF
Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $261m on Aug 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.63 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points.
| Measure | BND | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +12.7% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +11.8% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 8.1 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.66% |
| Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and WTMF as of Aug 31, 2026 | $167.4bn | $261m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.62 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.38: about 0.38% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.37% | |
| Down-week capture | 34.4% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
BND and WTMF on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
WTMF
WTMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.62 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.38, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.38% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks WTMF fell 0.37% on average, a down-week capture of 34.4%. Over the same 52 weeks WTMF returned +11.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.1 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Are BND and WTMF in the same category?
- BND is a bond ETF and WTMF is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or WTMF?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and WTMF +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or WTMF?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.63 percentage points a year. That is about $63 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against WTMF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-wtmf
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BND against WTMF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-wtmf
[BND against WTMF (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-wtmf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.