Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs RSST: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to RSST's +23.3%, and BND charges 0.03% to RSST's 0.99%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and RSST

Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $480m on Jul 31, 2026 for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
BND total return, 1 year
+23.3%
RSST total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.99%
RSST expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.96 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points.

BND vs RSST: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDRSST
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+23.3%
Total return, 52 weeks+22.5%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash18.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.99%
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and RSST as of Jul 31, 2026$167.4bn$480m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.85
Beta to the S&P 500+1.45: about 1.45% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 1.76%
Down-week capture164.8%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +23.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (AGG) +14.8% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +8.5 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.99%
Holdings 16300 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and RSST as of Jul 31, 2026 $167.4bn $480m

BND and RSST on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

RSST

RSST is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.85 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.45, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.45% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks RSST fell 1.76% on average, a down-week capture of 164.8%. Over the same 52 weeks RSST returned +22.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 18.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are BND and RSST in the same category?
BND is a bond ETF and RSST is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BND or RSST?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and RSST +23.3%.
Which is cheaper, BND or RSST?
BND is cheaper, by 0.96 percentage points a year. That is about $96 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against RSST, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-rsst

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.