Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs DBMF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to DBMF's +22.1%, and BND charges 0.03% to DBMF's 0.85%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and DBMF

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $5.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+22.1%
DBMF total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.85%
DBMF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.82 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.4 points.

BND vs DBMF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDDBMF
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+22.1%
Total return, 52 weeks+22.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.6%
Against cash18.8 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.85%
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and DBMF as of Oct 27, 2026$161.4bn$5.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.26
Beta to the S&P 500+0.21: about 0.21% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.21%
Down-week capture19.1%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.10% on average

Method

Risk and return

May 17, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 388 weekly returns
BND DBMF
Return
Total return edge DBMF +9.7% +95.4%
Annualized edge DBMF +1.3% +9.4%
Price return edge DBMF −12.3% +27.6%
Risk
Volatility edge BND 5.8% 11.4%
Max drawdown edge BND (slight) −18.4% −19.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DBMF −0.25 0.60
Sortino edge DBMF −0.34 0.84
Calmar edge DBMF 0.07 0.47
Reading

DBMF returned more: +95.4% to +9.7%. BND swung less: 5.8% to 11.4%. BND fell slightly less at its worst: −18.4% to −19.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BND vs DBMF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDDBMFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+9.7%+95.4%DBMFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.3%+9.4%DBMFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.3%+27.6%DBMFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.8%11.4%BNDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.2%8.1%BNDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.4%−19.9%BND (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.250.60DBMFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.340.84DBMFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.070.47DBMFAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 388 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
Issuer Vanguard iMGP
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Managed futures
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +22.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.85%
Holdings 16301 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and DBMF as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $5.2bn

BND and DBMF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0B264EB05A

BND and DBMF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BND returned −1.3% and DBMF +22.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 23.4 points.
  2. Cost. BND charges 0.03% of assets a year and DBMF 0.85%, a gap of 0.82 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

DBMF

DBMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.21, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.21% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.10% on average. In the same weeks DBMF fell 0.21% on average, a down-week capture of 19.1%. Over the same 52 weeks DBMF returned +22.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 18.8 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are BND and DBMF in the same category?
BND is a bond ETF and DBMF is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BND or DBMF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and DBMF +22.1%.
Which is cheaper, BND or DBMF?
BND is cheaper, by 0.82 percentage points a year. That is about $82 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against DBMF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-dbmf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.