Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DBMF vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DBMF returned +22.1% to IVV's +13.7%, and IVV charges 0.03% to DBMF's 0.85%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DBMF and IVV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.2bn for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+22.1%
DBMF total return, 1 year
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
0.85%
DBMF expense ratio
0.03%
IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.82 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $5.2bn.

DBMF vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDBMFIVV
Return
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+13.7%
Total return, 52 weeks+22.5%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedS&P 500
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.6%
Against cash18.8 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.2bn$885.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.26
Beta to the S&P 500+0.21: about 0.21% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.21%
Down-week capture19.1%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.10% on average

Method

Risk and return

May 17, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 388 weekly returns
DBMF IVV
Return
Total return edge IVV +95.4% +197.5%
Annualized edge IVV +9.4% +15.7%
Price return edge IVV +27.6% +165.1%
Risk
Volatility edge DBMF 11.4% 18.4%
Max drawdown edge DBMF −19.9% −31.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IVV 0.60 0.73
Sortino edge IVV 0.84 1.07
Calmar edge IVV (slight) 0.47 0.49
Reading

IVV returned more: +197.5% to +95.4%. DBMF swung less: 11.4% to 18.4%. DBMF fell less at its worst: −19.9% to −31.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DBMF vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDBMFIVVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+95.4%+197.5%IVVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.4%+15.7%IVVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+27.6%+165.1%IVVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.4%18.4%DBMFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.1%12.6%DBMFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.9%−31.8%DBMFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.73IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.841.07IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.470.49IVV (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 388 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iMGP iShares
What it is Managed futures Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +22.1% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.03%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 505
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.2bn $885.1bn

DBMF and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E57844A0E7

DBMF and IVV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DBMF returned +22.1% and IVV +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.
  2. Cost. DBMF charges 0.85% of assets a year and IVV 0.03%, a gap of 0.82 points.
  3. Size. DBMF has $5.2bn in net assets and IVV $885.1bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); IVV is 170.2 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DBMF

DBMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.21, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.21% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.10% on average. In the same weeks DBMF fell 0.21% on average, a down-week capture of 19.1%. Over the same 52 weeks DBMF returned +22.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 18.8 percentage points ahead of cash.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Are DBMF and IVV in the same category?
DBMF is an alternatives ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or IVV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +22.1% and IVV +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or IVV?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.82 percentage points a year. That is about $82 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DBMF against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbmf-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.