Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs TLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to TLTW's −3.0%, and TLT charges 0.15% to TLTW's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and TLTW

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and $1.6bn for iShares TLT Premium Income+ ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
−3.0%
TLTW total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.35%
TLTW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; TLT is far larger, $47.4bn against $1.6bn.

TLT vs TLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTTLTW
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%−3.0%
Price change, 1 yearfell 12.0%fell 12.8%
Latest payout, annualized16.5%
Return of capital, issuer estimate73% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexBenchmark: 20+ Year Treasury, measured through TLT
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$47.4bn$1.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 2, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 216 weekly returns
TLT TLTW
Return
Total return edge TLTW −13.2% −1.6%
Annualized edge TLTW −3.4% −0.4%
Price return edge TLT −26.2% −45.5%
Risk
Volatility edge TLTW 14.3% 11.1%
Max drawdown edge TLTW −22.0% −16.4%
Downside capture 101.2% 79.8%
Beta 1.01 0.73
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge TLTW −0.49 −0.39
Sortino edge TLTW −0.66 −0.50
Treynor −0.072 −0.059
Calmar edge TLTW −0.15 −0.02
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.01 0.41
Information ratio −0.10 0.49
Tracking error 0.7% 5.4%

Each against its own benchmark: TLT against BBLB, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; TLTW against TLT, Sep 2, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

TLTW returned more: −1.6% to −13.2%. TLTW swung less: 11.1% to 14.3%. TLTW fell less at its worst: −16.4% to −22.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: TLT vs TLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTTLTWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−13.2%−1.6%TLTWPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−3.4%−0.4%TLTWTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−26.2%−45.5%TLTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.3%11.1%TLTWSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.5%8.6%TLTWLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−22.0%−16.4%TLTWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.4%69.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.2%79.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.010.73Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.89Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.49−0.39TLTWReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.66−0.50TLTWReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.072−0.059Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar−0.15−0.02TLTWAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkBBLBTLTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+0.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.010.41Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.8% to +0.8%−2.9% to +4.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.49Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%5.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 216 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and TLTW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT TLTW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in TLTW
TREASURY BOND 4.35%
TREASURY BOND 4.15%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.09%
TREASURY BOND 4.04%
TREASURY BOND 3.95%
TREASURY BOND 3.94%
TREASURY BOND 3.91%
TREASURY BOND 3.90%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF TLTW iShares TLT Premium Income+ ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Income ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries covered call, vs TLT
Total return, 1 year −7.9% −3.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) −7.9% (TLT)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB +4.9 pts vs TLT
Cash paid, 1 year not an income fund 9.9%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.35%
Holdings 47 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $47.4bn $1.6bn

TLT and TLTW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-3C11070D36

TLT and TLTW do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. TLT follows ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index and TLTW is measured against 20+ Year Treasury through TLT.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 TLT returned −7.9% and TLTW −3.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

TLT and TLTW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

TLTW

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLTW paid 9.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.0%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −7.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.5%, paid monthly. iShares estimates that 73% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Are TLT and TLTW in the same category?
TLT is a bond ETF and TLTW is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, TLT or TLTW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and TLTW −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or TLTW?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against TLTW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-tltw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.