Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

LTTI vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LTTI returned −7.7% to TLT's −7.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to LTTI's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LTTI and TLT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14m for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
−7.7%
LTTI total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.65%
LTTI expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; TLT is far larger, $47.4bn against $14m.

LTTI vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLTTITLT
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.7%−7.9%
Price change, 1 yearfell 15.5%fell 12.0%
Latest payout, annualized9.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: 20+ Year Treasury, measured through TLTICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14m$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 21, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 87 weekly returns
LTTI TLT
Return
Total return edge TLT −2.6% −2.2%
Annualized edge TLT −1.6% −1.3%
Price return edge TLT −15.6% −9.2%
Risk
Volatility edge LTTI (slight) 10.0% 10.8%
Max drawdown edge LTTI (slight) −11.6% −12.0%
Downside capture 92.7% 101.2%
Beta 0.92 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge TLT −0.50 −0.44
Sortino edge TLT (slight) −0.63 −0.57
Treynor −0.055 −0.072
Calmar edge TLT −0.13 −0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.7% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.55 −0.01
Information ratio −0.17 −0.10
Tracking error 1.8% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: LTTI against TLT, Feb 21, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026; TLT against BBLB, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

TLT returned more: −2.2% to −2.6%. LTTI swung slightly less: 10.0% to 10.8%. LTTI fell slightly less at its worst: −11.6% to −12.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: LTTI vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLTTITLTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−2.6%−2.2%TLTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−1.6%−1.3%TLTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−15.6%−9.2%TLTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.0%10.8%LTTI (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.0%8.3%LTTI (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−11.6%−12.0%LTTI (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture85.8%102.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.7%101.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.921.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.971.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.50−0.44TLTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.63−0.57TLT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.055−0.072Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar−0.13−0.11TLTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkTLTBBLBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.7% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.55−0.01Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.2% to +1.8%−0.8% to +0.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.17−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.8%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 87 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LTTI and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LTTI TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LTTI
2026-10-30 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 0.82 98.96%
2026-10-30 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 81.33 -0.10%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Bond ETF
What it is option income, vs TLT Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year −7.7% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.9% (TLT) −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark +0.2 pts vs TLT −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Cash paid, 1 year 8.1% not an income fund
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 47
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14m $47.4bn

LTTI and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E3EB5C1F8B

LTTI and TLT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. LTTI is measured against 20+ Year Treasury through TLT and TLT follows ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Cost. LTTI charges 0.65% of assets a year and TLT 0.15%, a gap of 0.50 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

LTTI and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LTTI

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LTTI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.7%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −7.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are LTTI and TLT in the same category?
LTTI is an option-income ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, LTTI or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LTTI returned −7.7% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, LTTI or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LTTI against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ltti-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.