Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SMH vs TQQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SMH returned +56.8% to TQQQ's +22.4%, and SMH charges 0.35% to TQQQ's 0.78%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SMH and TQQQ
Net assets: $71.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Semiconductor ETF, and $37.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Pair scorecard
SMH costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.4 points; SMH is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | SMH | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +56.8% | +22.4% |
| What its daily multiple gave, 3 months | 28.9% | |
| What the underlying did, 3 months | QQQ 9.8% | |
| What the underlying did, 3 months | QQQ 9.8% | |
| The multiple over the whole window | 3 times gives +29.4% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 15.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Semiconductors | Nasdaq-100 |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 43.4 pts | |
| Against its daily multiple, 3 months | 3.4 points short | |
| Against the whole-window multiple | 3.9 points short | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.78% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $71.1bn | $36.9bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 81% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 79% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 69% | |
Risk and return
Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 773 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: SMH against ACWI, Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; TQQQ against QQQ, Feb 19, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
TQQQ returned more: +19,648.5% to +3,977.0%. SMH swung less: 26.9% to 56.4%. SMH fell less at its worst: −44.2% to −80.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SMH | TQQQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +3,977.0% | +19,648.5% | TQQQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +28.3% | +42.7% | TQQQ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +3,365.0% | +18,619.9% | TQQQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.9% | 56.4% | SMH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 17.5% | 37.2% | SMH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −44.2% | −80.4% | SMH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 197.3% | Not measured | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 117.1% | 147.6% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.40 | 3.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.63 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.00 | 0.89 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.53 | 1.34 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.192 | 0.164 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.64 | 0.53 | SMH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | QQQ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +12.6% a year | −3.5% a year | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. | |
| Alpha t-stat | 2.95 | −4.48 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | +4.2% to +20.9% | −5.1% to −2.0% | Not an edge | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.96 | 0.83 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 17.4% | 38.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 773 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
SMH and TQQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SMH and TQQQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. SMH follows Semiconductors and TQQQ follows Nasdaq-100.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SMH returned +56.8% and TQQQ +22.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 34.4 points.
- Cost. SMH charges 0.35% of assets a year and TQQQ 0.78%, a gap of 0.43 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SMH
By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +56.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 43.4 pts. It sits 15.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Over the three months to Oct 28, 2026, TQQQ returned 25.5%, against 28.9% for three times QQQ's daily moves. Of that 3.9, daily compounding is −0.5 points, which any 3 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is −3.4 points against 3 times each day's move, compounded. QQQ moved at 18% annualized over that window.
Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times QQQ's 9.8% implies +29.4%, which makes TQQQ look 3.9 points short. That is not the fund's objective, which is daily. TQQQ aims to return +3 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. The more it moves, the further the two numbers separate.
Questions people ask
- Are SMH and TQQQ in the same category?
- SMH is a thematic ETF and TQQQ is a leveraged ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, SMH or TQQQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SMH returned +56.8% and TQQQ +22.4%.
- Which is cheaper, SMH or TQQQ?
- SMH is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SMH against TQQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smh-vs-tqqq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SMH against TQQQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smh-vs-tqqq
[SMH against TQQQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smh-vs-tqqq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.