Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SLV vs USO: Differences, Returns & Fees
SLV is a commodity fund and USO a commodity futures fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, USO returned +133.3% against +14.9%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SLV and USONet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares Silver Trust and $1.9bn for United States Oil Fund, LP.
Pair scorecard
SLV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 118.4 points; SLV is 14.2 times larger.
| Measure | SLV | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.9% | +133.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | 82.3%, high on Jul 14, 2008 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Silver | Oil futures |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.86% |
| Net assets | $26.9bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
May 5, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,068 weekly returnsSLV returned more: +248.1% to −68.8%. SLV swung less: 32.5% to 37.2%. SLV fell less at its worst: −75.2% to −98.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SLV | USO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +248.1% | −68.8% | SLV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +6.3% | −5.5% | SLV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +248.1% | −68.8% | SLV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 32.5% | 37.2% | SLV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 23.0% | 26.9% | SLV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −75.2% | −98.0% | SLV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.30 | −0.01 | SLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.42 | −0.01 | SLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.08 | −0.06 | SLV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,068 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
SLV and USO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SLV and USO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. SLV follows Silver and USO follows Oil futures.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SLV returned +14.9% and USO +133.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 118.4 points.
- Cost. SLV charges 0.50% of assets a year and USO 0.86%, a gap of 0.36 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USO
USO holds oil futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +133.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.86% a year. It sat 82.3% below its high of Jul 14, 2008 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SLV or USO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +14.9% and USO +133.3%.
- Which is cheaper, SLV or USO?
- SLV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SLV against USO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-uso
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SLV against USO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-uso
[SLV against USO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-uso)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.