Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SIVR vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

SIVR and SLV are both commodity funds, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SIVR returned +15.0% against +14.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SIVR and SLV

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.7bn for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and $26.9bn for iShares Silver Trust.

At a glance
+15.0%
SIVR total return, 1 year
+14.9%
SLV total return, 1 year
0.30%
SIVR expense ratio
0.50%
SLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SIVR costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; SLV is 7.3 times larger.

SIVR vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSIVRSLV
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.0%+14.9%
Drawdown
Below its high53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksSilverSilver
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.50%
Net assets$3.7bn$26.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Risk and return

Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 899 weekly returns
SIVR SLV
Return
Total return edge SIVR (slight) +267.1% +255.6%
Annualized edge SIVR (slight) +7.8% +7.6%
Price return edge SIVR (slight) +267.1% +255.6%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 31.0% 31.1%
Max drawdown edge Tie −74.7% −75.2%
Downside capture 99.8% 100.2%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.35 0.35
Sortino edge Tie 0.51 0.50
Treynor 0.109 0.107
Calmar edge SIVR (slight) 0.10 0.10
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year −0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.96 −0.92
Information ratio 0.19 −0.19
Tracking error 0.8% 0.8%

Each against its own benchmark: SIVR against SLV, Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; SLV against SIVR, Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SIVR returned slightly more: +267.1% to +255.6%. SIVR and SLV swung about the same: 31.0% and 31.1%. SIVR and SLV fell about the same at their worst: −74.7% and −75.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SIVR vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSIVRSLVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+267.1%+255.6%SIVR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.8%+7.6%SIVR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+267.1%+255.6%SIVR (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility31.0%31.1%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation21.3%21.4%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−74.7%−75.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.6%100.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.350.35TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.510.50TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1090.107Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.100.10SIVR (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSLVSIVRThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year−0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.96−0.92Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.6%−0.6% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.19−0.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%0.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 899 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn iShares
What it is Holds silver Holds silver
Total return, 1 year +15.0% +14.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.9% (SLV) +15.0% (SIVR)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLV −0.1 pts vs SIVR
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.50%
Net assets $3.7bn $26.9bn

SIVR and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2B991C352A

SIVR and SLV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. SIVR charges 0.30% of assets a year and SLV 0.50%, a gap of 0.20 points.
  2. Size. SIVR has $3.7bn in net assets and SLV $26.9bn (Net assets); SLV is 7.3 times larger.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow Silver.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SLV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SIVR

Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SLV

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or SLV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +15.0% and SLV +14.9%.
Which is cheaper, SIVR or SLV?
SIVR is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SIVR against SLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sivr-vs-slv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.