Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SIVR?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SIVR +15.0%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or SIVR?

SIVR is cheaper, by 4.38 percentage points a year. That is about $438 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +15.0%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and SIVR

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $178m for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and $3.7bn for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

BWET on its own →SIVR on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+15.0%

SIVR total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.30%

SIVR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SIVR costs 4.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5106.7 points; SIVR is far larger, $3.7bn against $178m.

BWET vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	SIVR
Return
Measure	BWET	SIVR
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+15.0%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	SIVR
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026	53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	SIVR
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Silver
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	SIVR
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.30%
Net assets	$178m	$3.7bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	SIVR
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer Breakwave abrdn

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Holds silver

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +15.0%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.9% (SLV)

Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs SLV

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.30%

Net assets $178m $3.7bn

BWET and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SIVR

Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SIVR?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SIVR +15.0%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or SIVR?: SIVR is cheaper, by 4.38 percentage points a year. That is about $438 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs IAU BWET vs GLD BWET vs USO BWET vs SLV SIVR vs SLV SIVR vs USO IAU vs SIVR GLDM vs SIVR

Where to next

BWET on its own →SIVR on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

abrdn website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against SIVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-sivr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.