Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SIVR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or SIVR?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs SIVR: how they differ

BWET and SIVR are both commodity funds, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +54.2%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

BWET and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	abrdn
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Physical Silver
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+36.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.45%

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SIVR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or SIVR?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

BWET against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against SIVR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources