Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IAU vs USO: Differences, Returns & Fees
IAU is a commodity fund and USO a commodity futures fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, USO returned +133.3% against +2.7%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IAU and USONet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $60.1bn for iShares Gold Trust and $1.9bn for United States Oil Fund, LP.
Pair scorecard
IAU costs 0.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 130.6 points; IAU is far larger, $60.1bn against $1.9bn.
| Measure | IAU | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.7% | +133.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.6%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | 82.3%, high on Jul 14, 2008 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold | Oil futures |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.86% |
| Net assets | $60.1bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
Apr 21, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,070 weekly returnsIAU returned more: +493.4% to −70.9%. IAU swung less: 17.5% to 37.1%. IAU fell less at its worst: −44.4% to −98.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IAU | USO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +493.4% | −70.9% | IAU | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.0% | −5.8% | IAU | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +493.4% | −70.9% | IAU | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.5% | 37.1% | IAU | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.0% | 26.9% | IAU | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −44.4% | −98.0% | IAU | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.48 | −0.02 | IAU | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.70 | −0.03 | IAU | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.20 | −0.06 | IAU | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,070 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
IAU and USO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IAU and USO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IAU follows Gold and USO follows Oil futures.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IAU returned +2.7% and USO +133.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 130.6 points.
- Cost. IAU charges 0.25% of assets a year and USO 0.86%, a gap of 0.61 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Its expense ratio is 0.25% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
IAU holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USO
USO holds oil futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +133.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.86% a year. It sat 82.3% below its high of Jul 14, 2008 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IAU or USO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +2.7% and USO +133.3%.
- Which is cheaper, IAU or USO?
- IAU is cheaper, by 0.61 percentage points a year. That is about $61 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IAU against USO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-uso
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IAU against USO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-uso
[IAU against USO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-uso)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.