Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLV?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +15.0% and XLV +25.6%.

Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLV?

XLV is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

SIVR vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLV an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XLV returned +25.6% against +15.0%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SIVR and XLV

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF, and $47.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.

SIVR on its own →XLV on its own →

At a glance

+15.0%

SIVR total return, 1 year

+25.6%

XLV total return, 1 year

0.30%

SIVR expense ratio

0.08%

XLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLV costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.6 points.

SIVR vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	SIVR	XLV
Return
Measure	SIVR	XLV
Total return, 1 year	+15.0%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	SIVR	XLV
Below its high	53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	SIVR	XLV
What it tracks	Silver	Health Care Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Measure	SIVR	XLV
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.08%
Net assets, SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLV as of Oct 27, 2026	$3.7bn	$47.0bn
Holdings
Measure	SIVR	XLV
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		60.6%

Method

Side by side

SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer abrdn State Street

What it is Holds silver Tracks an index of Health care

Total return, 1 year +15.0% +25.6%

Its benchmark over the same days +14.9% (SLV) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLV not measured

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.08%

Holdings not counted 62

Net assets, SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLV as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $47.0bn

SIVR and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

SIVR

Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLV

XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLV?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +15.0% and XLV +25.6%.
Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLV?: XLV is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

SIVR vs VHT SIVR vs XLF SIVR vs XLK SIVR vs XHB USO vs XLV SLV vs XLV GLDM vs XLV BWET vs XLV

Where to next

SIVR on its own →XLV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →XLV dividend history →XLV holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

abrdn website ↗

XLV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XLV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SIVR against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sivr-vs-xlv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.