Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLV?

SIVR charges 0.45% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SIVR vs XLV: how they differ

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLV an equity index fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +20.4%.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

SIVR and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	abrdn	State Street
What it is	Physical Silver	Health care
Total return, 1 year	+54.2%	+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+36.7 pts	+2.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.45%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	63

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLV?: SIVR charges 0.45% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIVR against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against XLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sivr-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources