Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLK?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLK?

SIVR charges 0.45% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SIVR vs XLK: how they differ

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLK an equity index fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +39.2%.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

SIVR and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	abrdn	State Street
What it is	Physical Silver	Technology
Total return, 1 year	+54.2%	+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+36.7 pts	+21.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.45%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	74

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLK?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLK?: SIVR charges 0.45% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIVR against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sivr-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources