Which returned more over the last year, BWET or XLK?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and XLK returned +39.2%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or XLK?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs XLK: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and XLK an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +39.2%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

BWET and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	State Street
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Technology
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+21.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	74

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or XLK?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and XLK returned +39.2%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or XLK?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources