Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IGM?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IGM +21.7%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or IGM?

IGM is cheaper, by 4.31 percentage points a year. That is about $431 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and IGM an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +21.7%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and IGM

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

BWET on its own →IGM on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+21.7%

IGM total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.37%

IGM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IGM costs 4.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5100.0 points; IGM is far larger, $10.9bn against $186m.

BWET vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	IGM
Return
Measure	BWET	IGM
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+21.7%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	IGM
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026	6.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	IGM
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	IGM
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$186m	$10.9bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	IGM
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		56.8%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Breakwave iShares

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +21.7%

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.37%

Holdings not counted 295

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and IGM as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $11.0bn

BWET and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IGM

IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IGM?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IGM +21.7%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or IGM?: IGM is cheaper, by 4.31 percentage points a year. That is about $431 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs FTEC BWET vs IYW BWET vs XLK BWET vs VGT IGM vs USO IGM vs SIVR IGM vs SLV GLDM vs IGM

Where to next

BWET on its own →IGM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IGM dividend history →IGM holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

IGM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IGM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IGM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against IGM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-igm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.