Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IGM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and IGM returned +32.7%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or IGM?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs IGM: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and IGM an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +32.7%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

BWET and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	iShares
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+15.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.37%
Holdings	not filed	272

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 272 positions, with the top ten at 58.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IGM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and IGM returned +32.7%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or IGM?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against IGM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-igm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources